Let's debate state job cuts before election
Balancing the budget is too important to leave it to magic
By John Huebscher
A predictable feature of campaigns for state office is that
candidates promise to deliver a more efficient government by
reducing the number of people who work for it. This year is no
exception. Some have suggested the state workforce should be
reduced by 10,000 positions over the next 10 years.
The suggestion to shrink the state's work force over the next 10
years may sound good between now and Nov. 5. But it will do little
to close the budget gap that will exist in February, the deadline
by which the Governor must submit Wisconsin's state budget for
2003-05. For only positions eliminated in the next two years will
generate any savings that can be applied to the state's budget
deficit, now estimated to be well over $1 billion a year.
Next we must consider that state employees are paid from
different pots of money such as motor fuel taxes, other fees or
federal dollars. Of Wisconsin's total workforce of nearly 67,000,
only about 36,500 are paid for with general-purpose revenues (GPR)
raised from taxes like the income tax and sales tax. Since it is
the general fund that is running the deficit, only cuts in GPR
positions will help close the deficit.
Which of these 36,500 people will we do without to balance the
budget?
Most candidates want to be tough on crime. Thus it is unlikely
any Governor will reduce the staff of the Department of Correction,
which employs about 9,000, to accommodate staffing needs of our
exploding prison system.
Nor should we expect to see cuts among the 375 prosecutors in
the offices of Wisconsin's 72 district attorneys who are now state
employees nor of the 523 public defenders mandated by law to
represent indigent criminal defendants.
This leaves about 26,600 workers. Or does it?
The University of Wisconsin employs just over 19,000 people.
While the UW is a tempting target, it is also vital to any strategy
to develop Wisconsin's work force at a time of a state labor
shortage. The legislature only recently balked at cutting the UW
budget by $100 million, settling for cuts half that much. Will the
Governor elected in November target UW positions?
If we add the UW's 19,000 workers to the "do not cut" list we
are left with a state work force of 7,600. Of these over 2,000 are
employed by the Department of Health and Family Services, the
agency that provides services to the elderly, persons with
disabilities and families with special needs. Earlier this year
there was a bi-partisan consensus not to cut programs targeted at
such vulnerable populations.
By now you have noticed there are not enough employees remaining
to supply a reduction of 10,000 in the state workforces. Even if
the UW staff took a 10% cut of nearly 2,000 staff, it would be
necessary to eliminate all but the remaining GPR-funded jobs to get
to the magic 10,000 total.
Does this mean every state job is too essential to be
eliminated? No. But these employees deliver programs and services
that our people say they want. It seems reasonable that any plan to
eliminate state employees be accompanied by a discussion as to what
programs we will do without in order to make the cuts.
This discussion should take place before the election, not
after.
(Huebscher is executive director of the Wisconsin Catholic
Conference, the civil arm of the state's five diocesan bishops. Its
website is www.wisconsincatholic.com.)
|