Free religion
Debate over religious symbols on public property again raises constitutional issues
By Patricia Kasten
Compass Associate Editor
Once again, we debate whether government imposes religion by
allowing religious symbols on public property.
A Ten Commandments monument stands in La Crosse's Cameron Park,
donated in 1965 by the Eagles Club. Last year, after objections
arose, La Crosse returned the monument, and the land it's on, to
the Eagles. (Much the same happened with a Jesus statue in
Marshfield in 1998.)
This was unacceptable to the Freedom from Religion Foundation
which, along with 22 defendants, sued La Crosse. On July 14, U.S.
District Court Judge Barbara Crabbe ordered the monument removed. A
month later, La Crosse voted to appeal.
The Catholic Times, the La Crosse diocesan paper, quotes
several plaintiffs (Aug. 7) saying that the monument, near a
farmers market, has caused sleepless nights and imposes contrary
beliefs upon them.
Our Constitution's First Amendment says "Congress shall make no
law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof." Nowhere does it say we must be protected
from expressions of religion. Yet many believe it orders "a wall of
separation between church and state."
This quote is not from the Constitution, but Thomas Jefferson.
It is in a letter (Jan. 1, 1802) written to the Danbury (Conn.)
Baptist Association, which had congratulated Jefferson on his
presidential election. During the campaign, Jefferson had been
accused of atheism.
In the letter, Jefferson clarified his refusal to declare a
national day of fast or thanksgiving, an act that had revived the
atheism charges, especially since George Washington and John Adams
had declared such days of devotion. In his letter's first draft,
Jefferson wrote: "I have refrained from prescribing even those
occasional performances of devotion, practiced indeed by the
Executive of another nation as the legal head of its church."
Jefferson was referring to George of England, not only king, but
head of the Church of England: church and state combined in one
man. Jefferson was assuring the Baptists that he would avoid even
an appearance of this in his presidency.
Jefferson feared a government controlled by one religion - much
as we see in some Muslim nations today: Nigeria, which has
condemned a woman to death for adultery, and Pakistan, where a
Christian can be executed for speaking against the Koran.
But while Jefferson feared government control of
religion, did he fear all religion or religious expression
linked with government? Unlikely. The Declaration of Independence,
which he authored, mentions God four times. And Jefferson, like
presidents before and since, attended prayers by Congressional
chaplains. He even attended church services held in the
Capitol.
What Jefferson really feared was anyone imposing beliefs about
God on someone else. And, logically, he would have opposed forcing
non-belief upon anyone.
Because, while Jefferson opposed the domination of any one
religion, he viewed religious belief as a moral influence. Carved
on the Jefferson Memorial is his quote: "And can the liberties of a
nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm
basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties
are the gift of God?"
While our Founding Fathers like Jefferson would not have wanted
Pope John Paul elected president, neither would they have banned
all his quotes - or Martin Luther King Jr.'s or the Dalai Llama's -
from the halls of government - or symbols of religion, whether
Christian, Jewish (the Ten Commandments are Jewish in origin) or
Muslim, removed from the public eye.
Why? Because these things remind us of - and inspire us to -
things greater than ourselves, things greater than the fears that
cause sleepless nights. Yet, in ruling that religious symbols can
be never seen on public property or spoken of in public
schools, our courts forget that.
We should not forget that Jefferson, while wary of
institutionalized religion, still sought, at his second inaugural,
the guidance of "that Almighty Being ... to whom we are bound to
address our devout gratitude for the past, as well as our fervent
supplications and best hopes for the future."
|