The crucifix and Mass' sacrifice
New Mass rules remind us of God's free, self-giving love for each of us
By Bishop Robert Banks
Styles change, even in the Church. I guess I should not use the
word "styles," since the subjects we deal with are so important. So
let's use the word "emphases."
One example leaped out at me a week ago. I ran across a prayer
in our present Roman Missal that had been written by contemporary
liturgists or scholars back in the early 70's. Presumably it
expressed the feelings of that time.
The prayer asked that our eyes be opened to the wonders of this
life, so that we might address God as our Father. It is a good
prayer, but, while it might have been "in" back in the early 70's,
it is not "in" today. A number of today's Catholics do not like to
use the title "Father" when praying. I pray that may change real
soon.
Two other changes of emphasis also concern the Mass. The first
has to do with the cross or crucifix. Back in the 60's, there was a
new and deserved emphasis on the Resurrection of our Lord. We were
invited to reflect more on the Risen Life won for us by Jesus'
death on the cross. On that first Easter, the Risen Christ breathed
upon the Apostles the Holy Spirit, who brought forgiveness of sin
and newness of life to them and to all of us. The fruits of the
Holy Spirit have been central to my own preaching these past 12
years: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity,
faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
Crucifix disappeared
In my opinion, that laudable emphasis on the Resurrection
resulted in the disappearance of the traditional crucifix from the
sanctuary of many of our churches. Instead of a crucifix - a cross
with the nailed body of Jesus - there was often a plain cross or a
cross with the resurrected body of Christ. Either one still speaks
of the love of Christ which is central to the mystery of his
crucifixion, but also suggests, in a way, the new life won for the
believer.
The new General Instruction of the Roman Missal seeks a
balance. It does not require us to return to what used to be the
familiar large crucifix dominating the sanctuary. But it does say,
"There is also to be a cross, with the figure of Christ crucified
upon it, either on the altar or near it, where it is clearly
visible to the assembled congregation." That crucifix may be the
one that is carried in procession at the beginning of Mass.
In my mind, this requirement that there be a crucifix in the
sanctuary area, and also in the procession, is a welcome
development. Besides calling our attention visually to the fact
that the Mass is the sacramental recall and re-presentation of
Jesus' death, the crucifix is an eloquent reminder that Jesus did
suffer and die for each one of us.
It also is a consolation when we experience, in our own lives,
the crosses that inevitably come. Finally, the crucifix says to us
that living the Christian life is a struggle, but a worthwhile
struggle and one in which we can always call on the Lord for
strength.
A second change has to do with a re-emphasis among theologians
and liturgists on the fact that the Mass is a sacrifice. Catholics
my age remember using the expression "the sacrifice of the Mass."
But that terminology slipped away during the past 40 years.
Instead, the emphasis has been more on the fact that the Mass is a
banquet. And that is an important emphasis. We truly are, or should
be, nourished both by the Word of Scripture and by Holy
Communion.
Losing sight
Why would there now be a re-emphasis among writers on the fact
that the Mass is also a sacrifice? In my opinion, it is an
understandable reaction to the increased use of Communion Services.
We may be losing sight of the vast difference between the Mass and
a Communion Service. A significant part of that difference is the
fact that the Mass is a sacrifice.
Sacrifice and worship
But "sacrifice" is not an easily explained reality. We moderns
are not used to sacrifice as a way to worship God. That is for
pre-modern peoples. So how can we explain sacrifice for a 21st
century Catholic?
I shall borrow one explanation from an article by Fr. Robert
Daly, S.J. in a recent issue of Theological Studies.
First of all, Fr. Daly acknowledges that, beginning with the New
Testament, early Christians referred to the Eucharist in
sacrificial terms. But he adds that they meant something different
from the sacrifices offered by other religions of that time. In
other religions, sacrifice was about offering something to God by
destroying it.
Fr. Daly says that, for Christians, it was different. Sacrifice
in New Testament understanding was, in the first place, the
self-offering of the Father who gave us his Son.
In second place was the response of the perfectly free,
self-giving, en-Spirited love of the Son to the Father. This
encompassed Jesus' whole life, including the Resurrection and the
giving of the Holy Spirit; but, at the center, was his death on the
cross.
In third place is the radical self-offering of believers in and
with Christ to the Father. This response - our response - is our
commitment to repeat, in our own lives, the way Jesus lived his
life. We do not and cannot do that on our own; we can only do so in
and through the power of the Holy Spirit, the same Spirit that was
in Jesus.
The Prayer says it
All of this is some pretty heavy theology, but it is what we
bishops, priests and people pray every time we celebrate Mass. Pay
attention to the Eucharistic Prayer, that part of the Mass that
begins, "The Lord be with you, Lift up your hearts ..." and ends
with the great Amen before the Our Father.
What are we doing in that prayer? Praying to the Father and
thanking him for the gift of his Son who offered himself on the
cross for us. We pray that, by the power of the Holy Spirit, the
bread and wine may become the Body and Blood of Christ offered on
the cross. We also pray that, by the power of the same Holy Spirit,
we believers may be made the Body of Christ, offering ourselves to
the Father.
That three-fold offering in love is what we miss when we have
Communion Services that bring us the fruit of the Mass.
|